Interested in sharing the research? You can order print copies of many research publications.

Order Reprints

Newsletter Sign-Up

Keep up to date with NPC news and events by signing up for our e-newsletter E.V.I.dently, and our CER Daily Newsfeed.

Subscribe POLICY

Consumer-Directed Health Plans: Pharmacy Benefits & "Better Practices"

On behalf of the National Pharmaceutical Council, The Benfield Group conducted a multi-phase research project investigating pharmacy benefit designs attached to consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs). The research was intended to identify the current landscape and best practice approaches for CDHPs and pharmacy benefits, as well as understand the health and economic impact of best practice models and evidence about higher value approaches to CDHP pharmacy benefit design.

About CDHPs

CDHPs are high-deductible plans offered in combination with an account that enrollees can access to offset the deductible expense. Premiums are generally lower than in traditional plans because enrollees must meet the higher deductibles before traditional medical and pharmacy coverage begins. There are two main types of CDHPs:

  • Health savings accounts (HSAs) are the predominant type of CDHP. Some employers and benefits advisors consider HSAs to be more advantageous to employees, who can deposit part of their pre-tax income and have ownership of the account, which they can use for medical, long term care and/or retirement expenses.
  • Health reimbursement accounts (HRAs), in which employees are reimbursed for medical services not covered under a health plan, are preferred by employers that like the HRAs’ flexibility and ability to recoup money when employees leave the company.

Findings

This research revealed that a standard CDHP model has emerged that employee benefits consultants (EBCs) routinely recommend and employers typically follow. Although employers’ strategies range in sophistication, most strategies include at least the following elements:

  • Communicate in advance of roll-out to prepare employees and educate them about what to expect and how CDHPs are different than what they’re used to;
  • Make a contribution to employees’ HSA or HRA accounts;
  • Cover preventive care (at least their interpretation of what is required by law);
  • Promote wellness and provide educational tools to help employees navigate health care choices; and
  • Monitor outcomes and make adjustments.

Though employers generally follow this standard model, diversity exists in CDHPs. Plans vary according to deductible levels, account contributions, coverage of prescription drugs, the level of wellness, decision support and financial literacy programs offered, and the integration of program offerings with plan design (eg, incentives).

For employees who are low income or who have high health care needs, however, these types of plans can impose a bigger burden of out-of-pocket costs, potentially causing these employees to reduce their compliance with necessary treatments or avoid care altogether.

CDHP “Better Practices”

Some employers are establishing “better practices” in overall CDHP plan design and in their approach prescription benefits. Some of the innovations are designed to have broad impact, providing support and aligning incentives across the workforce to improve health and health care decision-making. Other innovations are targeted at mitigating the harmful impacts of blunt CDHP and prescription benefit plan design on high health care need/low-income employees.

Key differentiating “better practices” include:

  • Use of integrated health and productivity data in plan design and performance measurement;
  • Lower net deductibles (deductible minus company HSA or HRA account contributions);
  • Varying contributions based on income (to protect low-income workers) or linking to incentives for wellness or consumer behaviors;
  • Implementation of value-based approach to prescription drug coverage in HRA-based plans; and
  • Implementation of broad list of preventive drugs, combined with a value-based approach in HSAs.

Methodology

As part of this project, Benfield conducted a survey of 96 large employers (1,000 to 4,999 employees) and jumbo employers (5,000+ employees) in the fall of 2013. They also conducted 25 interviews with employers (13), employee benefits consultants (5), subject matter experts (4) and health plans (3) in the winter of 2013-2014.

Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently January 2016

MessageThe Importance of Evidence, Value, Access and Innovation in 2016In his annual health care outlook, NPC President Dan Leonard explains why...
Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently October 2015

MessageWhat’s the Fuss About Evidence From Clinical Experience? Here’s Why It MattersAt a health care forum in Washington, DC, earlier this month,...
Blog Post

Consumer-Directed Health Plans & Employees' Health and Productivity

More employers are offering consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs), which are high-deductible plans offered in combination with an account that...
Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently July 2015

NPC MessageWho Can Say What, and When? Could We See Changes in Biopharmaceutical Communications?It’s possible that 2015 could be the year that we see...
Press Release

Study Quantifies Impact of Pharmaceuticals on Enhanced Productivity

(WASHINGTON, DC, August 1, 2012)–The costs to employers of chronic health conditions on employee productivity are well documented, but few studies...
Press Release

New Survey Shows Employers Eyeing CER, PCORI for Health Information

Washington, DC, June 22, 2011--Employers are aware of comparative effectiveness research (CER) and its potential to answer critical questions about...
Press Release

Study Sheds New Light on the Impact of Medication Adherence, Multiple Chronic Diseases and Health Risks in the Workplace

(Chicago -- June 16, 2011) A new study suggests that while medication adherence is a critical element in reducing the impact of illness, employers...
Press Release

New Report Urges Employers, Researchers and Policy Makers to Rethink How They Measure Health Care Results

San Francisco, CA & Washington, DC (February 28, 2011) -- Understanding the full value of improved health, including improvements in workforce...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Changing Health Care Landscape

This content appeared in the January 2, 2012 print edition of Chain Drug Review. In the span of just one year, the health care landscape has...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Linking Chronic Conditions to Medication Adherence and Productivity

It's no secret that chronic disease is the major driver of health care costs in the United States, accounting for two-thirds of the rise in health...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Comparative Effectiveness Research: What Will Employers Do With the Information?

For years now, employers have expressed concern about the cost of providing health care to their employees and its impact on the competitiveness of...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Synergies at Work: Realizing the Full Value of Health Investments

According to new research funded and published by the National Pharmaceutical Council, health benefits decisions based on the full value of improved...
YouTube Videos

NPC/Benfield CER Employer Survey Results

Chuck Reynolds, president of the employer practice at the Benfield Group, discusses the findings from his NPC-sponsored research, "Comparative...
YouTube Videos

IBI's Tom Parry on Employers and Health Investments

Integrated Benefits Institute President Tom Parry, PhD, sat down with NPC to discuss how employers today are defining the value of their health...
YouTube Videos

Value-Based Insurance Design

National Pharmaceutical Council President Dan Leonard discusses a new report on Value-Based Insurance Design (VBID) with Dr. A. Mark Fendrick, Co-...
YouTube Videos

Health & Productivity as a Business Strategy

National Pharmaceutical Council President Dan Leonard interviews Dr. Ron Loeppke, executive vice president of Alere Inc. and Co-Chairman of the...
Blog Post

Consumer-Directed Health Plans & Employees' Health and Productivity

More employers are offering consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs), which are high-deductible plans offered in combination with an account that...
Blog Post

#TBT: NPC Research—A 2014 Recap

As part of our “Throwback Thursday” blog series, we’re taking a look at a topic that’s currently in the news and tagging it with previous...
Blog Post

#TBT: Consumer-Directed Health Plans & Employers’ Decision-Making

As part of our “Throwback Thursday” blog series, we’re taking a look at a topic that’s currently in the news and tagging it with previous...
Blog Post

A Step Toward Clear, Consistent, Transparent Formulary Decisions

The process that health insurers use to determine health coverage is not always clear, making it hard for patients, providers and biopharmaceutical...

Transparency in Evidence Evaluation and Formulary Decision-Making

Although the type of evidence required to make healt

Imputing Productivity Gains From Clinical Trials

Researchers developed a new method to capture the impact that medicines may have on reducing the...

Comparative Effectiveness Research: Do Employers Care? What Will They Do? What About Productivity?

A survey by NPC and the Benfield Group found that one of the benefits employers are looking for...
  •  
  • 1 of 9
  • >