Individual Treatment Effects

Within the health care system there has always been a struggle--among researchers, medical professionals, health insurance companies, and others--to meet the needs of millions of people and still recognize the unique needs each person has by getting the right treatment to the right person at the right time. As health care spending has risen over the years, the effort to both improve the quality of care and get spending under control has led to a growing public and private investment in comparative effectiveness research (CER), sometimes called “patient-centered outcomes research” (PCOR).

The goal of CER is to “assess the benefits and harms of preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, palliative, or health delivery system interventions to inform decision making, highlighting comparisons and outcomes that matter to people.” At its most basic definition, CER involves comparing one treatment option against another treatment option. Examples include surgery vs. watchful waiting; using a device vs. exercising; or drug vs. drug--there are any number of treatments that can be compared.

While this information is helpful for the “average” patient or population, it might not be relevant for every patient. Each person is unique thanks to a multitude of factors, such as racial and ethnic backgrounds, age, genetics, chronic conditions, disease severity, gender, environment, and even personal preferences when it comes to health treatments. These and other factors make patients different and affect how they may respond to a certain treatment. For these reasons, while the “average patient” may respond best to a particular treatment, some patients may experience little to no benefit from it, so other treatment options may be best for them. These differences in how patients respond to treatments are known as “heterogeneity,” or “individual treatment effects.”

Heterogeneity matters because if a medical professional is providing a patient care based on how the “average” person fared on that treatment, then that patient might not be getting the most ideal treatment. It also matters because most insurance companies design their policies to meet the needs of the majority of people, so those who may respond differently may have a more difficult time getting other treatment options covered. Many groups that represent patients are concerned that CER could be used to block or restrict access to treatments that help some, but not “average,” people.

Health care stakeholders further explored this issue during a daylong conference on November 30, 2012, "The Myth of Average: Why Individual Patient Differences Matter."

Blog Post

#TBT: Enrollment Deadline & the Role of Rx in Health Exchanges

As part of our “Throwback Thursday” blog series, we’re taking a look at a research topic that’s currently in the news and tagging it with...
Commentary and Testimony Page

NPC Comments on CMS' Proposed Changes to Protected Classes

March 7, 2014Marilyn B. TavennerAdministratorCenters for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services200 Independence...
Blog Post

NPC Asks CMS to Consider Patients’ Individual Treatment Effects In Part D Rulemaking

The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to consider maintaining “protected classes...
Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently November 2013

MessageCER Collaborative Is Assessing Evidence and Informing Decision-MakingToday we’re faced with an ever-growing availability of health information...
Press Release

NPC, UMD Study: Factors That Cause Different Treatment Responses Are Not Well Understood or Studied

Washington, DC, November 4, 2013—Although researchers and health care providers widely recognize that individuals with stage IV prostate cancer react...
Press Release

National Pharmaceutical Council Comments on PCORI Approval of Research Methodology Standards

Washington, DC (November 19, 2012)—The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today commented on the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (...
Press Release

Leading Researchers Outline Principles for Conduct of Comparative Effectiveness Research

WASHINGTON, DC (September 11, 2012)—A new set of principles developed by a group of leading researchers could help to ensure more consistency in how...
Press Release

National Pharmaceutical Council Statement on PCORI's Draft Methodology Report

Washington, DC (June 5, 2012)—The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today commented on the release of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research...
Commentary and Testimony Page

NPC Comments on CMS' Proposed Changes to Protected Classes

March 7, 2014Marilyn B. TavennerAdministratorCenters for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services200 Independence...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The Risks of Standardized Health Care

Think about the last time you visited a medical office. Even at a specialist’s office, chances are that each person waiting for his or her name to be...
Commentary and Testimony Page

When the Sound Bite Doesn’t Tell the Full Story

Not long ago, President Obama was asked at a press conference about comparative effectiveness research (CER) and how it fits into the health care...
YouTube Videos

Using Distributed Data Networks to Understand Heterogeneity in Real-World Data

Kimberly Westrich, director of health services research at the National Pharmaceutical Council, explains how large observational datasets like...
YouTube Videos

Taking Patient Variations Into Account

Dr. Lisa Egbuonu-Davis, founder of ROI Squared, explains that data is generally designed toward looking at the mean differences instead of the...
YouTube Videos

Payer Views of Individualized Health Care

Dr. Daniel Malone, professor at the University of Arizona School of Pharmacy, explains how payers view the issue of individualized therapy. He says...
YouTube Videos

Dr. Puckrein on the Issue of Individual Patient Differences

Dr. Gary Puckrein, founder and president of the National Minority Quality Forum, says that there is tremendous variability in how different patients...
Blog Post

#TBT: Enrollment Deadline & the Role of Rx in Health Exchanges

As part of our “Throwback Thursday” blog series, we’re taking a look at a research topic that’s currently in the news and tagging it with...
Blog Post

NPC Asks CMS to Consider Patients’ Individual Treatment Effects In Part D Rulemaking

The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today asked the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to consider maintaining “protected classes...
Blog Post

Relationship Between Individual Patient Differences and Health Outcomes

Despite the widely accepted fact that a patient’s biologic (e.g., age, race, genetic factors) and nonbiologic factors (e.g., social behaviors,...
Blog Post

Four Online Seminars Focus on Impact of Individual Treatment Effects on Drug Therapy

Health care decision-makers interested in understanding how heterogeneity, or individual treatment effects, impact patient health outcomes will...

Research

  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • >

Commentary & Testimony