Research Outlines Key Factors Influencing the Adoption of New Evidence Into Medical Practice

National Pharmaceutical Council study published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Washington, DC (July 10, 2013)—Research published today in the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research outlines influential factors that impact how quickly new medical evidence is adopted and put into practice by health care decision-makers.

“We’ve seen firsthand that when a celebrity like Angelina Jolie talks about breast cancer and genetics, people are listening and want to take action,” said National Pharmaceutical Council Chief Science Officer Robert Dubois, MD, PhD. “And while media attention is an important factor in the adoption of health care information, it isn’t the only one. Scientific issues, economic drivers, and the level of patient involvement in their therapy also play key roles.”

The research, “When Is Evidence Sufficient for Decision Making? A Framework for Understanding the Pace of Evidence Adoption and Application,” was written by Dr. Dubois, Michael Lauer, MD, Director, Division of Cardiovascular Sciences at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, and Eleanor Perfetto, PhD, MS, formerly of Pfizer Inc. and now at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.

According to the Institute of Medicine, it takes an average of 17 years for new data, or evidence, to become part of routine care. Using three well-documented cases in which new information was disseminated to the public—statins, drug-eluting stents and bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer—the authors developed a framework to determine which factors were most influential in changing clinical practice. Their framework includes the following considerations:

  • Validity, reliability, and maturity of the science: Is the current understanding of the particular condition and its treatment understood well enough so that new information can be taken into account?
  • Economic drivers that might influence adoption: Who is paying for the treatment? Is it being reimbursed? What marketing or detailing efforts were influential?
  • Rapid (or slow) incorporation into practice guidelines: How quickly—or slowly—were the results accepted by groups that develop guidelines?
  • Communication: Are the results being amplified by major media outlets, celebrities or social media?
  • Patients’ and providers’ ability to apply results to their needs: Can patients or providers apply published evidence to their decisions?

With billions of dollars being spent on comparative effectiveness research, the framework can be useful in helping organizations consider how to translate and disseminate research findings, noted Dr. Dubois. “It is important to consider the critical factors that affect adoption and help to optimize the pace with which new treatments and findings are brought into routine clinical practice,” he said.  

NPC will host a webinar to discuss the research and a related white paper developed by IMS Health on July 31, 2013, from 1 pm – 2 pm ET. Register for the webinar on NPC's website.

About the National Pharmaceutical Council:

The National Pharmaceutical Council is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation. Founded in 1953 and supported by the nation’s major research-based pharmaceutical companies, NPC focuses on research development, information dissemination, and education on the critical issues of evidence, innovation and the value of medicines for patients. For more information, visit www.npcnow.org and follow NPC on Twitter @npcnow.

Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently August 2014

NPC MessageHealth and Productivity Go Hand in HandClosely tied to the productivity and prosperity of our nation is the health and safety of its...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: How Effective is CER?; PCORI Funding Opportunities; Big Data in Health Care (August 18-22)

How effective is comparative effectiveness research (CER)? This week on Twitter, health care stakeholders shared NPC Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: All Things Patient (August 11-15)

This week’s comparative effectiveness research (CER) tweets revolve around patient-centric news. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Will CER Really Deliver Better Patient Outcomes? (August 4-8)

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders shared news about the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s next funding round with...
Press Release

NPC Study Outlines When & How Health Decision-Makers Should Consider Individual Patient Differences

Washington, DC (July 29, 2014)—New research led by the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) can assist health care stakeholders to understand when...
Press Release

NPC Annual Stakeholder Survey: Comparative Effectiveness Research Is Important, But Impact on Health Care Decision-Making Is Still on the Horizon

(Washington, DC, May 19, 2014)—A new survey of health care stakeholders reveals continued optimism for the use of comparative effectiveness research...
Press Release

CER Collaborative Improving Health Outcomes Through New Comparative Evidence Tools

(Washington, DC, March 24, 2014)—Three peer-reviewed articles published in Value in Health offer important guidance to aid formulary decision-makers...
Press Release

NPC, UMD Study: Factors That Cause Different Treatment Responses Are Not Well Understood or Studied

Washington, DC, November 4, 2013—Although researchers and health care providers widely recognize that individuals with stage IV prostate cancer react...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The State of CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision Making

This month, NPC released its third annual survey on stakeholders’ views on comparative effectiveness research (CER), “The State of Comparative...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Keeping Our Eye on the CER Ball

Until the cherry blossoms begin to bloom later next month, most of the water cooler conversations in Washington will focus on the federal budget....
Commentary and Testimony Page

Leveling the Playing Field? Could a Landmark Decision Alter the CER Communications Landscape?

A growing chorus of voices is publicly sharing data on the effectiveness of treatment options, but one viewpoint has long been shut out of key areas...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Living Up to Its Name? The Role of Patient-Centered Research

Anyone who has ever received bad news from his or her health care provider or held a loved one’s hand when a diagnosis was delivered can understand...
YouTube Videos

Real-World Impact of Comparative Effectiveness Research Findings on Clinical Practice

National Pharmaceutical Council Chief Science Officer Robert W. Dubois, MD, PhD, discusses a peer-reviewed study suggesting that changes are needed...
YouTube Videos

CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision-Making

The National Pharmaceutical Council’s (NPC) fourth annual survey of health care stakeholders is continuing to shed light on the current environment...
YouTube Videos

Webinar: CER Collaborative: Tools You Can Use

Collaborative members hosted a webinar explaining how to use the tools they developed to create greater uniformity and transparency when evaluating...
YouTube Videos

Engaging Patients in Research

National Pharmaceutical Council President Dan Leonard explains why it's important to include patients throughout the research process. He says that...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: How Effective is CER?; PCORI Funding Opportunities; Big Data in Health Care (August 18-22)

How effective is comparative effectiveness research (CER)? This week on Twitter, health care stakeholders shared NPC Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: All Things Patient (August 11-15)

This week’s comparative effectiveness research (CER) tweets revolve around patient-centric news. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s (...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Will CER Really Deliver Better Patient Outcomes? (August 4-8)

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders shared news about the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s next funding round with...
Blog Post

PCORI Grants, HEOR & FDA Guidance Top CER Tweets of the Week (July 21-25)

What were some of the popular comparative effectiveness research (CER)-related topics on Twitter this week? We saw keen interest in the Patient-...

Research

  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • >

Commentary & Testimony