Interested in sharing the research? You can order print copies of many research publications.

Order Reprints

Newsletter Sign-Up

Keep up to date with NPC news and events by signing up for our e-newsletter E.V.I.dently, and our CER Daily Newsfeed.

Subscribe POLICY

Comparative Effectiveness Research: Do Employers Care? What Will They Do? What About Productivity?

This article discusses a survey of employers, conducted by the Benfield Group and supported by the National Pharmaceutical Council, that found that one of the benefits employers are looking for from comparative effectiveness research (CER) is more information about which treatments help with productivity. While data is beginning to emerge regarding the links between good health, productivity and employee wellness programs, this survey shows that most companies (or the benefit consultants they work with) do not have access to the information or any ability to use it in their decision-making.

Specifically, while fewer than one-third of employers or their vendors currently use information about absence, disability and return to work assessing the impact of alternative treatments, 70 percent indicate that such information would be “Important” or “Very Important” within CER. And, while fewer than 25% now use information about the impact of alternative treatments on work productivity in making decisions, over 60% rate this information as “Important” or “Very Important” in CER.

In a more direct analysis of the benefit of CER to employers, respondents were asked how they would handle two specific scenarios related to treatments for low back pain and diabetes. According to the findings, employers are generally more likely to take action based on CER evidence regarding diabetes. The reasons given include the “perceived higher total costs” of treating diabetes and a belief that it would be easier to make changes to address diabetes based on “already generally accepted guidelines for treatment.”

In addition to productivity related information, additional survey findings of note include clear messages about what other types of information employers want: “clinical outcomes of alternative treatments; information comparing utilization and cost of treatments; information about which treatments work best for specific population, and; comparative safety of alternative treatments.”

Although a subscription to the JOEM is required to read this article, the full study, survey instrument and video are available on NPC's website.

Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week (April 7-11, 2014)

Collaboration was a popular topic among comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders on Twitter this week. They tweeted about the National...
YouTube Videos

Webinar: CER Collaborative: Tools You Can Use

Collaborative members hosted a webinar explaining how to use the tools they developed to create greater uniformity and transparency when evaluating...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week (March 31- April 4, 2014)

This week, health care stakeholders on Twitter highlighted the many activities and sessions at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s (AMCP) 26th...
Blog Post

4/8 Webinar on CER Collaborative: Tools You Can Use

The CER Collaborative--a group formed by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP), the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes...
Press Release

CER Collaborative Improving Health Outcomes Through New Comparative Evidence Tools

(Washington, DC, March 24, 2014)—Three peer-reviewed articles published in Value in Health offer important guidance to aid formulary decision-makers...
Press Release

NPC, UMD Study: Factors That Cause Different Treatment Responses Are Not Well Understood or Studied

Washington, DC, November 4, 2013—Although researchers and health care providers widely recognize that individuals with stage IV prostate cancer react...
Press Release

National Pharmaceutical Council Statement on Appointment of PCORI Board Chair

Washington, DC, September 19, 2013—The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today released the following statement regarding the Government...
Press Release

National Pharmaceutical Council Studies New Formulary Decision-Making Tool

Washington, DC, August 19, 2013—A National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) study published in the peer-reviewed journal Pharmacy and Therapeutics...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The State of CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision Making

This month, NPC released its third annual survey on stakeholders’ views on comparative effectiveness research (CER), “The State of Comparative...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Keeping Our Eye on the CER Ball

Until the cherry blossoms begin to bloom later next month, most of the water cooler conversations in Washington will focus on the federal budget....
Commentary and Testimony Page

Leveling the Playing Field? Could a Landmark Decision Alter the CER Communications Landscape?

A growing chorus of voices is publicly sharing data on the effectiveness of treatment options, but one viewpoint has long been shut out of key areas...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Living Up to Its Name? The Role of Patient-Centered Research

Anyone who has ever received bad news from his or her health care provider or held a loved one’s hand when a diagnosis was delivered can understand...
YouTube Videos

Webinar: CER Collaborative: Tools You Can Use

Collaborative members hosted a webinar explaining how to use the tools they developed to create greater uniformity and transparency when evaluating...
YouTube Videos

Use of Big and Real-World Data by Pharma: More than Data Warehousing

Real-world data—a subset of big data—is clinical data used for decision-making that did not come from a clinical trial. According to Aaron Galaznik,...
YouTube Videos

Comparative Effectiveness Research and Usability Criteria

Dr. John Whitney, Staff VP for Medical Policy Formation, WellPoint, Inc., explains how usability criteria can help health care stakeholders conduct...
YouTube Videos

Engaging Patients in the Research Process

Dr. Dan Mullins, professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, explains why it is important...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week (April 7-11, 2014)

Collaboration was a popular topic among comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders on Twitter this week. They tweeted about the National...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week (March 31- April 4, 2014)

This week, health care stakeholders on Twitter highlighted the many activities and sessions at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s (AMCP) 26th...
Blog Post

4/8 Webinar on CER Collaborative: Tools You Can Use

The CER Collaborative--a group formed by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP), the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes...
Blog Post

CER Collaborative Rolls Out New Resources to Aid Formulary Decision-Making

A newly published series of peer-reviewed articles developed by the CER Collaborative will help formulary decision-makers more effectively evaluate...

Research

When Is Evidence Sufficient for Decision-Making?

This study outlines influential factors that impact how quickly new medical evidence is adopted and...
  •  
  • 1 of 22
  • >

Commentary & Testimony