Interested in sharing the research? You can order print copies of many research publications.

Order Reprints

Newsletter Sign-Up

Keep up to date with NPC news and events by signing up for our e-newsletter E.V.I.dently, and our CER Daily Newsfeed.

Subscribe POLICY

Setting Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research: From Assessing Public Health Benefits to Being Open With the Public

Abstract (from Health Affairs): Medicine’s current evidence base is insufficient for many of the decisions made daily by clinicians, patients, purchasers, and policy makers. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) represents an effort by the US government to address this shortcoming by funding comparative effectiveness research (CER). Prioritizing that research will be a critical first step. To better understand components of an optimal process, NPC reviewed the literature and conducted interviews regarding the prioritization efforts of leading public and private health organizations in the United States and abroad. From this review, NPC proposes a framework for prioritization, poses and answers key questions, and makes recommendations regarding application of that framework. NPC also recommends that during the priority-setting process, there should be transparent conversations among those who make decisions about the priorities and the public.

 

View the interview with NPC Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert Dubois and read the press release.

 

About the project:

NPC undertook this research to understand the components of an optimal approach to prioritizing CER. It is especially timely because PCORI is working on its priorities for the CER that it will fund; these priorities will set the tone for all of the institute’s future activities.The research also highlights the difficult questions PCORI will face as the public dialogue on its national research priorities and research agenda begins.

Why prioritization is important:

Not all topics can be studied; there are budget and time constraints that limit what activities can be done. Without setting criteria or defining priorities, one risks including all areas and prioritizing none, an outcome that is not helpful to patients or providers who are looking for answers.

Key recommendations that should be used to make research decision-making processes more effective include:

  • Defining priorities to identify what has greater and lesser importance;
  • Ensuring that all stakeholders are engaged in all aspects of the prioritization process, including identifying topics and prioritizing among them;
  • Using a systematic approach when considering all evidence as it relates to prioritizing topics;
  • Maintaining an open and transparent consensus process which can handle inevitable disagreement;
  • Communicating the process and the results of the process;
  • Allowing for the incorporation of new evidence that takes into account continuing advances in medical care or technology; and
  • Evaluating the results of the process by asking both those involved in the process and the general public. 
Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently January 2016

MessageThe Importance of Evidence, Value, Access and Innovation in 2016In his annual health care outlook, NPC President Dan Leonard explains why...
Blog Post

ASCO’s Clinical Pathways Recommendations and Remaining Challenges

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) today released its “policy statement on clinical pathways in oncology,” which acknowledges the...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The Importance of Evidence, Value, Access and Innovation in 2016

Last year, in our 2015 Health Care Outlook published in Chain Drug Review, I highlighted the recent announcement by the U.S. Department of Health and...
Blog Post

Key Considerations for Cost Effectiveness Thresholds

While putting a price tag on the value of health care services and the life years gained is common in countries including the United Kingdom, Canada...
Press Release

Fit for Purpose? New NPC, AcademyHealth Framework Closes Gaps Between Payer Needs and Research Answers

(Washington, DC, September 21, 2015)—Despite multi-million dollar public and private investments to tap into big data and improve the evidence...
Press Release

NPC Comments on CMS’ Announcement to Allow Broader Access to Publicly Funded Databases

(Washington, DC, June 2, 2015)—The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) today commented on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS)...
Press Release

State Medicaid Directors Share Views on Comparative Effectiveness Research And Its Impact on Policy in National Pharmaceutical Council Survey

(Washington, DC, April 16, 2015)—A new survey conducted on behalf of the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) shows that state Medicaid directors...
Press Release

NPC Highlights Stakeholder Views on Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Environment for Health Care Decision-Making

(Washington, DC, March 26, 2015)—A new survey of health care stakeholders reveals continued optimism that comparative effectiveness research (CER)...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The Importance of Evidence, Value, Access and Innovation in 2016

Last year, in our 2015 Health Care Outlook published in Chain Drug Review, I highlighted the recent announcement by the U.S. Department of Health and...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Chain Drug Review – Commentary: “Health Care Outlook for 2015”

This commentary was originally published in the January 5, 2015 issue of Chain Drug Review.By: Dan Leonard, President, National Pharmaceutical...
Commentary and Testimony Page

NPC Comments on PCORI Proposal for Peer Review of Primary Research and Public Release of Research Findings

November 7, 2014Dr. Joe SelbyExecutive DirectorPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute1828 L St., NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20036Dear Dr....
Commentary and Testimony Page

The State of CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision Making

This month, NPC released its third annual survey on stakeholders’ views on comparative effectiveness research (CER), “The State of Comparative...
YouTube Videos

When Is Evidence Fit for Purpose? Closing Gaps Between Researchers, Payers

Despite multi-million dollar public and private investments to tap into big data and improve the evidence available for health care decision-making,...
YouTube Videos

NHC's Boutin: Measuring Health Outcomes & Patient Aspirations

Marc Boutin, JD, CEO, National Health Council, emphasizes the need to ensure that we are integrating a patient’s perspective at the time that we are...
YouTube Videos

NHC's Boutin: Incorporating Patient Aspirations With Medical Outcomes

Marc Boutin, JD, CEO, National Health Council, says while medical outcomes are critical to patients with chronic illnesses, it's also important for...
YouTube Videos

Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Environment for Health Care Decision-Making

During a March 26, 2015 webinar, the National Pharmaceutical Council discussed the results of its annual stakeholder survey on comparative...
Blog Post

ASCO’s Clinical Pathways Recommendations and Remaining Challenges

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) today released its “policy statement on clinical pathways in oncology,” which acknowledges the...
Blog Post

Key Considerations for Cost Effectiveness Thresholds

While putting a price tag on the value of health care services and the life years gained is common in countries including the United Kingdom, Canada...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: JCER Editorial on Treatment Sequences in Oncology; JNCCN Discusses CER Database Analyses (December 14-18, 2015)

What were comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders talking about on Twitter this week? Popular topics included the Journal of...
Blog Post

#TBT: CER Collaborative & Environmental Trends

As part of our Throwback Thursday blog series, we’re taking a look at a topic that’s currently in the news and tagging it with previous research...

Developing Evidence that is Fit for Purpose: A Framework for Payer and Research Dialogue

A study published in the September 2015 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care introduces a...
cersurvey-15

2015 Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Environment for Health Care Decision-Making

NPC's fifth annual survey, "Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and the Environment for Health...
  •  
  • 1 of 43
  • >