Interested in sharing the research? You can order print copies of many research publications.

Order Reprints

Newsletter Sign-Up

Keep up to date with NPC news and events by signing up for our e-newsletter E.V.I.dently, and our CER Daily Newsfeed.

Subscribe POLICY

Setting Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research: From Assessing Public Health Benefits to Being Open With the Public

Abstract (from Health Affairs): Medicine’s current evidence base is insufficient for many of the decisions made daily by clinicians, patients, purchasers, and policy makers. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) represents an effort by the US government to address this shortcoming by funding comparative effectiveness research (CER). Prioritizing that research will be a critical first step. To better understand components of an optimal process, NPC reviewed the literature and conducted interviews regarding the prioritization efforts of leading public and private health organizations in the United States and abroad. From this review, NPC proposes a framework for prioritization, poses and answers key questions, and makes recommendations regarding application of that framework. NPC also recommends that during the priority-setting process, there should be transparent conversations among those who make decisions about the priorities and the public.

 

View the interview with NPC Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert Dubois and read the press release.

 

About the project:

NPC undertook this research to understand the components of an optimal approach to prioritizing CER. It is especially timely because PCORI is working on its priorities for the CER that it will fund; these priorities will set the tone for all of the institute’s future activities.The research also highlights the difficult questions PCORI will face as the public dialogue on its national research priorities and research agenda begins.

Why prioritization is important:

Not all topics can be studied; there are budget and time constraints that limit what activities can be done. Without setting criteria or defining priorities, one risks including all areas and prioritizing none, an outcome that is not helpful to patients or providers who are looking for answers.

Key recommendations that should be used to make research decision-making processes more effective include:

  • Defining priorities to identify what has greater and lesser importance;
  • Ensuring that all stakeholders are engaged in all aspects of the prioritization process, including identifying topics and prioritizing among them;
  • Using a systematic approach when considering all evidence as it relates to prioritizing topics;
  • Maintaining an open and transparent consensus process which can handle inevitable disagreement;
  • Communicating the process and the results of the process;
  • Allowing for the incorporation of new evidence that takes into account continuing advances in medical care or technology; and
  • Evaluating the results of the process by asking both those involved in the process and the general public. 
Newsletter Volume

E.V.I.dently October 2014

Message From NPCMind the Gap: Improving Quality Measurement in Accountable Care SystemsOur society is obsessed with quality, from the cars that we...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Fendrick Elected to IOM, GAO Calls to Fill PCORI Methodology Committee Seat & More (October 20-24)

This week, comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders tweeted about new appointments and open positions at top health care organizations....
YouTube Videos

Why are quality measures important? We asked health care thought leaders to tell us why.

Quality measurement, tied to financial incentives, is one of many approaches accountable care programs are using to promote system-wide improvement....
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: The State of Accountable Care, JAMA on PCORI’s Perspective, Real-World Impact of CER (October 13-17)

Health care stakeholders tweeted about accountable care, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and the real-world impact of comparative...
Press Release

Fellowship in Health Care Policy Available Through a Partnership of the National Pharmaceutical Council and Milken Institute School of Public Health at The George Washington University

WASHINGTON, DC (September 17, 2014)–The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC), in conjunction with Milken Institute School of Public Health (Milken...
Press Release

NPC Study Outlines When & How Health Decision-Makers Should Consider Individual Patient Differences

Washington, DC (July 29, 2014)—New research led by the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) can assist health care stakeholders to understand when...
Press Release

NPC Annual Stakeholder Survey: Comparative Effectiveness Research Is Important, But Impact on Health Care Decision-Making Is Still on the Horizon

(Washington, DC, May 19, 2014)—A new survey of health care stakeholders reveals continued optimism for the use of comparative effectiveness research...
Press Release

CER Collaborative Improving Health Outcomes Through New Comparative Evidence Tools

(Washington, DC, March 24, 2014)—Three peer-reviewed articles published in Value in Health offer important guidance to aid formulary decision-makers...
Commentary and Testimony Page

The State of CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision Making

This month, NPC released its third annual survey on stakeholders’ views on comparative effectiveness research (CER), “The State of Comparative...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Keeping Our Eye on the CER Ball

Until the cherry blossoms begin to bloom later next month, most of the water cooler conversations in Washington will focus on the federal budget....
Commentary and Testimony Page

Leveling the Playing Field? Could a Landmark Decision Alter the CER Communications Landscape?

A growing chorus of voices is publicly sharing data on the effectiveness of treatment options, but one viewpoint has long been shut out of key areas...
Commentary and Testimony Page

Living Up to Its Name? The Role of Patient-Centered Research

Anyone who has ever received bad news from his or her health care provider or held a loved one’s hand when a diagnosis was delivered can understand...
YouTube Videos

Why are quality measures important? We asked health care thought leaders to tell us why.

Quality measurement, tied to financial incentives, is one of many approaches accountable care programs are using to promote system-wide improvement....
YouTube Videos

Real-World Impact of Comparative Effectiveness Research Findings on Clinical Practice

National Pharmaceutical Council Chief Science Officer Robert W. Dubois, MD, PhD, discusses a peer-reviewed study suggesting that changes are needed...
YouTube Videos

Using Real-World Evidence to Increase Health Care Access, Improve Quality & Reduce Costs

Mitchell Sugarman, vice president of health economics, policy and payment at Medtronic Cardiac and Vascular Group, explains that health care decision...
YouTube Videos

CER and the Environment for Health Care Decision-Making

The National Pharmaceutical Council’s (NPC) fourth annual survey of health care stakeholders is continuing to shed light on the current environment...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Fendrick Elected to IOM, GAO Calls to Fill PCORI Methodology Committee Seat & More (October 20-24)

This week, comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders tweeted about new appointments and open positions at top health care organizations....
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: The State of Accountable Care, JAMA on PCORI’s Perspective, Real-World Impact of CER (October 13-17)

Health care stakeholders tweeted about accountable care, patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) and the real-world impact of comparative...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Health Affairs on the High Value of Specialty Medications, Pediatric CER Guidelines, Patient Heterogeneity (October 6-10)

This week, comparative effectiveness research (CER) stakeholders tweeted articles about specialty medications, CER guidelines and individual...
Blog Post

CER Tweets of the Week: Reports on Health Care Quality, Fellowships, and PCORI Turns 4

A report on health care quality from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, postdoctoral fellowships and the Patient-Centered Outcomes...

Research

  •  
  • 1 of 42
  • >

Commentary & Testimony