Resources
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation.
Filter by:
Topic
Topic
- (-) Accountable Care Organizations
- Alternative Payment Models
- Biopharmaceutical Innovation
- (-) Bundled Payments
- Clinical Pathways
- Decision Frameworks
- Elements of Value
- Evidence for Decision Making
- (-) Formulary/Benefit Design
- Formulary Development
- (-) Good Practices for Evidence
- Health Care Quality Measures
- Health Spending
- Health Spend Management
- High-Deductible Health Plans
- Impact on Outcome & Spending
- Individual Treatment Effects & Personalized Access
- IRA Implementation
- Low-Value Care
- Pandemic Response
- Patient Cost Sharing
- Paying for Cures
- Policy & Regulatory Barriers
- Real-World Data
- Real-World Evidence
- Regulatory Barriers & Challenges
- Understanding Health Spending
- Utilization Management & Step Therapy
- Value-Based Contracts
- Value-Based Insurance Design
- (-) Value Assessment
- Value Assessment Frameworks
- Value Assessment Methods
Resource Type
Display Only
Showing 144 Results
IVI Introduces Transparent Approach for Value Assessment
The Innovation and Value Initiative (IVI) released its first assessment of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis using its new approach toward value assessment. NPC is still evaluating IVI’s new…
Toward Better Value
There is a disconnect between the important role employers believe their pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) play in helping to manage prescription drug benefits and employers’ perceptions of the…
NPC Talks Value, Benefit Design at AMCP Research Symposium and Nexus 2017
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is pleased to be participating in next week’s Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus 2017 meeting in Dallas, Texas. As a sponsor of and participant in…
NPC in AJPB: Guiding Practices for Patient-Centered Value Assessment
In response to growing concerns about health care costs, during the past few years, we’ve seen an increase in the development and use of value assessment frameworks. A variety of physician, payer and…
Appropriate Value Assessment Entails A Broad Perspective Of Impact and A Comprehensive Use of Evidence
NPC Chief Science Officer and Executive Vice President Robert W. Dubois looks at recent publications that highlight the need to consider a societal perspective when assessing value and utilize real…
NPC in Chain Drug Review: Should Patients With the Same Condition Bear Different Costs?
NPC President Dan Leonard tackles variable copays in his latest commentary for Chain Drug Review. In it, he considers when variable cost-sharing is less acceptable for patients who require higher…
An Important Dialogue About Orphan Drugs
While it’s encouraging to see that the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) began the conversation about the value of orphan drugs, treatments that are used for conditions affecting very…
Same Condition, Different Costs: Should Patients Pay Different Amounts?
Patients who have the same condition sometimes pay different out-of-pocket costs for their medications, but when is this differential more appropriate? Join NPC in tackling this dilemma in the…
Optimization of Medication Use at Accountable Care Organizations
This study assesses a broad range of factors related to how accountable care organizations optimize medication use and meet financial and quality metrics.
NPC is Going to ISPOR’s 22nd Annual International Meeting – Are You?
NPC will be at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) 22nd Annual International Meeting, held May 20-24 in Boston, to lead issue panels and workshops,…
Incorporating What Matters to Patients in Quality Measures: A Discussion With NPAF’s Dr. Balch
NPC spoke with Alan Balch, PhD, chief executive officer of the National Patient Advocate Foundation, to ask his thoughts about the impact of quality measures on patient care, particularly in the…
How Can We Improve Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care?
NPC and Discern Health analyzed the current oncology quality measure landscape for 10 high-priority cancers, published in the white paper "Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care,"…
Value Assessment Frameworks: Are They Up To The Challenge?
In this article published on the Health Affairs Blog, NPC researchers Dr. Robert Dubois and Kimberly Westrich ask: Are value assessment frameworks ready to compare the health and economic impacts of…
The Evolution of Value Assessment
A Health Affairs Blog post by NPC Chief Science Officer Robert Dubois, MD, PhD, and Vice President for Health Services Research Kimberly Westrich, MA, identified several key considerations that could…
Comparison of Value Framework Assessments for Multiple Myeloma
In this NPC-funded study conducted by the Lewin Group, four existing value assessment frameworks were compared head to head to understand how each framework would approach the same condition,…
How Is the Multiple Sclerosis Community Engaging on Value Assessment?
NPC President Dan Leonard caught up this week for a Q&A with Lisa Skutnik, President of the MS Coalition, to discuss how the value of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments is being assessed,…
When Is It Less Acceptable for Patients to Face Higher Cost-Sharing?
A new study explores when variation in consumer cost-sharing makes sense, and when it is less acceptable for patients with the same or similar conditions to have different out-of-pocket costs, as…
Does a One Size Fits All Cost-Sharing Approach Incentivize Appropriate Medication Use?
Patients contribute to health care costs through out-of-pocket expenses, like copays and coinsurance. These cost-sharing mechanisms are intended to help payers manage costs and…
Does a One-Size-Fits-All Cost-Sharing Approach Incentivize Appropriate Medication Use? A Roundtable on the Fairness and Ethics Associated with Variable Cost Sharing
A study convened an expert roundtable of patient, payer, and employer representatives to review four case studies to understand when it would be more (or less) acceptable to require patients…