Resources
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation.
Filter by:
Topic
Topic
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Alternative Payment Models
- Biopharmaceutical Innovation
- Bundled Payments
- Clinical Pathways
- Decision Frameworks
- Elements of Value
- (-) Evidence for Decision Making
- Formulary Development
- Good Practices for Evidence
- Health Care Quality Measures
- Health Spending
- (-) Health Spend Management
- High-Deductible Health Plans
- Impact on Outcome & Spending
- Individual Treatment Effects & Personalized Access
- Low-Value Care
- NPC News
- Pandemic Response
- Patient Centered Formulary & Benefit Design
- Patient Cost Sharing
- Paying for Cures
- Policy & Regulatory Barriers
- Real-World Data
- Real-World Evidence
- Regulatory Barriers & Challenges
- Understanding Health Spending
- Utilization Management & Step Therapy
- Value-Based Contracts
- Value-Based Insurance Design
- Value Assessment
- Value Assessment Frameworks
- Value Assessment Methods
Resource Type
Resource Type
Display Only
Showing 45 Results
Health Care Spending Guiding Principles
NPC established a set of principles to assess health care spending estimates and policies to ensure alignment with the goals of patient-centered care.
Chairman’s Blog: Let Data and Research Guide the Pricing and Access Policy Debate
NPC Board Chair and BMS SVP Michael Ryan reflects on the biopharmaceutical industry's role in solving global health challenges and how to address misunderstandings about what it takes to bring…
Social Determinants Interventions: Good Policy Solutions Require Good Data
In his AJMC editorial, NPC Interim President and CEO Dr. Robert Dubois says we need to address social determinants of health and improve patients’ lives through approaches based on strong data.
Health Budgets Should Cap Patient Harm
An NPC-RTI study provides guidance on quality metrics and practices that can help decision makers understand which budget cap features have the potential to lessen the impact on patient health and…
The Dollar or Disease Burden: Caps on Healthcare Spending May Save Money, but at What “Cost” to Patients?
This study assessed the potential effects of budget caps design on disease burden and cost savings to help budget decision makers understand which budget cap features minimize impact to patient…
AMCP Partnership Forum: Optimizing Prior Authorization for Appropriate Medication Selection
Stakeholders focused on the challenges of current prior authorization and step therapy programs, approaches to improve these processes for patient care, and reviewed current legislative activities…
Little Consistency in Evidence Cited by Commercial Health Plans for Specialty Drug Coverage
Evidence cited by payers in coverage decisions for specialty medicines varies significantly, with health plans only citing the same study in 15% of health plan coverage policies for a given drug and…
Integrating Data for Better Care Management
To accelerate the ability of care management programs to use data to combat rising health care costs, while ensuring patient access to innovative treatments that can improve outcomes, NPC sponsored…
What's Been the Bang for the Buck? Cost-Effectiveness of Health Care Spending Across Selected Conditions in the US
This study was designed to assess whether increased medical intervention spending on prevalent chronic conditions has been a good investment over time.
Restrictions, Variations in Specialty Drug Coverage May Affect Physician and Patient Choices
According to a study from the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at Tufts Medical Center and NPC, coverage of specialty medicines by major U.S. commercial health plans varies…
Could expanding pre-deductible coverage help those with chronic conditions?
According to a new issue brief from VBID Health, providing pre-deductible coverage for medicines used to treat common chronic conditions could lower out-of-pocket costs and increase medication…
Peer-reviewed Journal Editors' Views on Real-world Evidence
A study published in the International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care reveals that real-world evidence is considered valuable by the editors of peer-reviewed journals—if it meets…
Where Are They Now: Checking In With Former NPC Intern Jan Hansen
Jan Hansen, PhD, currently Vice President, Evidence for Access Medical Unit, US Medical Affairs at Genentech, participated in NPC’s pharmaceutical internship program in 1982. Dr. Hansen chatted with…
What Kinds of Information Do Payers and Providers Want for Decision-Making?
A new white paper from Xcenda/AmerisourceBergen and NPC highlights survey findings from payers and providers on what types of evidence are most important to them when it comes to making population…
CER Collaborative Helps Health Care Decision-Makers Assess Evidence
A feature article in this month's Value and Outcomes Spotlight highlights the importance of comparative effectiveness research (CER) and details the CER Collaborative Initiative, a joint effort by…