Resources
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation.
Filter by:
Topic
Topic
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Alternative Payment Models
- Biopharmaceutical Innovation
- Bundled Payments
- Clinical Pathways
- Decision Frameworks
- Elements of Value
- Evidence for Decision Making
- Formulary/Benefit Design
- Formulary Development
- Good Practices for Evidence
- (-) Health Care Quality Measures
- Health Spending
- Health Spend Management
- High-Deductible Health Plans
- Impact on Outcome & Spending
- (-) Individual Treatment Effects & Personalized Access
- IRA Implementation
- Low-Value Care
- (-) Pandemic Response
- Patient Cost Sharing
- Paying for Cures
- Policy & Regulatory Barriers
- Real-World Data
- Real-World Evidence
- Regulatory Barriers & Challenges
- Understanding Health Spending
- Utilization Management & Step Therapy
- Value-Based Contracts
- Value-Based Insurance Design
- Value Assessment
- (-) Value Assessment Frameworks
- Value Assessment Methods
Resource Type
Resource Type
Display Only
Showing 105 Results
Growing Questions About Frameworks Highlight Need for Guiding Practices for Value Assessment
For several years, NPC has kept a close eye on value assessment frameworks and engaging with developers on ways to improve their methodologies, involve patient organizations and use a broad range of…
Social Determinants of Health May Be Key to Value-based Care
There is growing recognition that improving access to care and patient health, including access to medications, requires focus on social, economic and environmental factors. At its upcoming…
Amplifying the Migraine Community Voice in ICER Value Assessment Process
In an interview with NPC, Lindsay Videnieks, director of the Headache and Migraine Policy Forum (HMPF), discusses the kind of effort it takes to become involved in the ICER value assessment process,…
Evaluation of Person-level Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Published Multiperson N-of-1 Studies: Systematic Review and Reanalysis
To understand when and how individual treatment effects are examined, conducted and reported, this study evaluated existing multiperson N-of-1 studies, which can identify whether an intervention is…
A Precision Paradigm for Value Assessment: How Frameworks Can Account for Personalized Medicine to Inform Payers, Providers, Innovators and Patients
Personalized Medicine Coalition Senior Vice President of Science Policy Daryl Pritchard, PhD, explores personalized medicine and value assessment frameworks.
Considerations When Using ICER's Value Assessments
This week we read with great interest an article posted on the Health Affairs Blog that directly responded to National Pharmaceutical Council Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert Dubois’ Sept. 17…
Why the VA Should Proceed with Caution on ICER Collaboration
In a new blog published by Health Affairs, NPC Chief Science Officer and Executive Vice President Robert W. Dubois, MD, PhD, expands on our initial thoughts on the collaboration between the Institute…
Will Value Assessment Frameworks Promote Health Value and Access for Veterans?
NPC expressed concerns about the partnership between the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Pharmacy Benefits Management Services office to…
NPC Evaluates ICER’s Revised Value Assessment Framework
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) today released its revised value assessment framework, which included a number of changes reflected in NPC's extensive public comments, but NPC…
Why Value Framework Assessments Arrive at Different Conclusions: A Multiple Myeloma Case Study
Researchers conducted cross-framework comparisons of multiple myeloma assessments using four value assessment frameworks and examined the consistency of findings across three case studies.
Why Value Framework Assessments Arrive at Different Conclusions
New peer-reviewed research from the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) found inconsistencies in how four value frameworks assessed multiple myeloma treatments.
National Eczema Association Weighs In on Value Frameworks
NPC President Dan Leonard recently sat down for a conversation with Julie Block, President and CEO of the National Eczema Association, to discuss atopic dermatitis (AD) and value assessment…
Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care
This comprehensive white paper from the National Pharmaceutical Council and Discern Health identified gaps in accountable care quality measure sets for cancer, which can lead to missed opportunities…
NPC Outlines Needed Improvements to ICER's Revised Value Assessment Framework
NPC submitted comments to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), offering constructive suggestions on ways to further improve its revised value assessment framework.
Including the Patient’s Perspective in Valuing Treatments for Arthritis
NPC President Dan Leonard sat down for a Q&A session with Sandie Preiss, Vice President for Advocacy and Access at the Arthritis Foundation, to discuss how the value of treatments for arthritis…
Workshop Looks “Under the Hood” of Value Assessment Frameworks
During the Feb. 27 interactive workshop, “Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Value Assessment Frameworks,” hosted by the National Pharmaceutical Council and PhRMA, health care…
Value Assessment Frameworks: Are They Up To The Challenge?
In this article published on the Health Affairs Blog, NPC researchers Dr. Robert Dubois and Kimberly Westrich ask: Are value assessment frameworks ready to compare the health and economic impacts of…
NPC President Dan Leonard Offers Perspectives on Health Reform
In a commentary recently published in The American Journal of Pharmacy Benefits, NPC President Dan Leonard offered 10 key considerations for stakeholders as they navigate health reform discussions.
Comparison of Value Framework Assessments for Multiple Myeloma
In this NPC-funded study conducted by the Lewin Group, four existing value assessment frameworks were compared head to head to understand how each framework would approach the same condition,…
Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care: Filling Gaps with Cross-Cutting Measures
According to a study, gaps in the quality measures used by accountable care programs to assess cancer care may obscure problems in care delivery and lead to missed opportunities for improvement of…