Resources
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation.
Filter by:
Topic
Topic
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Alternative Payment Models
- Biopharmaceutical Innovation
- Bundled Payments
- Clinical Pathways
- Decision Frameworks
- Elements of Value
- Evidence for Decision Making
- (-) Formulary/Benefit Design
- Formulary Development
- (-) Good Practices for Evidence
- Health Care Quality Measures
- Health Spending
- Health Spend Management
- High-Deductible Health Plans
- Impact on Outcome & Spending
- Individual Treatment Effects & Personalized Access
- IRA Implementation
- Low-Value Care
- (-) Pandemic Response
- Patient Cost Sharing
- Paying for Cures
- Policy & Regulatory Barriers
- Real-World Data
- Real-World Evidence
- Regulatory Barriers & Challenges
- Understanding Health Spending
- Utilization Management & Step Therapy
- (-) Value-Based Contracts
- Value-Based Insurance Design
- Value Assessment
- Value Assessment Frameworks
- Value Assessment Methods
Resource Type
Resource Type
Display Only
Showing 103 Results
A Comparison of Coverage Restrictions for Biopharmaceuticals and Medical Procedures
Payer evaluation and coverage of pharmaceuticals and medical procedures may differ independent of their clinical benefit. Therapy access depends on factor other than cost and clinical benefit,…
Coverage Decisions May Drive Potential Health Care System Inefficiency
New research from Tufts Medical Center and the National Pharmaceutical Council indicates that patient access to therapies depends on factors other than cost and clinical benefit.
NPC in Chain Drug Review: Pharmacy Outlook 2018
NPC President Dan Leonard explores value- and outcomes-based contracts, innovative benefit design, value assessment frameworks and more in his latest commentary for Chain Drug Review.
Toward Better Value
There is a disconnect between the important role employers believe their pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) play in helping to manage prescription drug benefits and employers’ perceptions of the…
NPC Talks Value, Benefit Design at AMCP Research Symposium and Nexus 2017
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is pleased to be participating in next week’s Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus 2017 meeting in Dallas, Texas. As a sponsor of and participant in…
NPC in Chain Drug Review: Should Patients With the Same Condition Bear Different Costs?
NPC President Dan Leonard tackles variable copays in his latest commentary for Chain Drug Review. In it, he considers when variable cost-sharing is less acceptable for patients who require higher…
Same Condition, Different Costs: Should Patients Pay Different Amounts?
Patients who have the same condition sometimes pay different out-of-pocket costs for their medications, but when is this differential more appropriate? Join NPC in tackling this dilemma in the…
Opportunities and Challenges With Value-Based Contracting
In his commentary for the American Journal of Pharmacy Benefits, NPC President Dan Leonard explores the challenges and opportunities in implementing value-based contracts.
AMCP Partnership Forum on Value in Oncology Proceedings Published in JMCP
The Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy this week published the proceedings from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy partnership forum, “Driving Value and Outcomes in Oncology,” which…
Incorporating What Matters to Patients in Quality Measures: A Discussion With NPAF’s Dr. Balch
NPC spoke with Alan Balch, PhD, chief executive officer of the National Patient Advocate Foundation, to ask his thoughts about the impact of quality measures on patient care, particularly in the…
When Is It Less Acceptable for Patients to Face Higher Cost-Sharing?
A new study explores when variation in consumer cost-sharing makes sense, and when it is less acceptable for patients with the same or similar conditions to have different out-of-pocket costs, as…
Does a One Size Fits All Cost-Sharing Approach Incentivize Appropriate Medication Use?
Patients contribute to health care costs through out-of-pocket expenses, like copays and coinsurance. These cost-sharing mechanisms are intended to help payers manage costs and…
Does a One-Size-Fits-All Cost-Sharing Approach Incentivize Appropriate Medication Use? A Roundtable on the Fairness and Ethics Associated with Variable Cost Sharing
A study convened an expert roundtable of patient, payer, and employer representatives to review four case studies to understand when it would be more (or less) acceptable to require patients…
Pharmacy Benefits: Super-sized, Minimized or Right-Sized?
In the December issue of Employee Benefit News, NPC Vice President of Comparative Effectiveness Research Jennifer Graff, PharmD, outlines a framework for the consideration of treatment flexibility in…
Got CER? Educating Pharmacists for Practice in the Future: New Tools for New Challenges
This study provides an early evaluation of the CER Collaborative's training program's impact on learners’ self-reported abilities to evaluate and incorporate comparative effectiveness research…
Standards and Guidelines for Observational Studies: Quality Is in the Eye of the Beholder
The lack of observational study standard/guideline agreement may contribute to variation in study conduct; disparities in what is considered credible research; and ultimately, what evidence is…
Developing Evidence that is Fit for Purpose: A Framework for Payer and Research Dialogue
A study published in the September 2015 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care introduces a framework developed by the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) and AcademyHealth that could help…
Private Sector Risk-Sharing Agreements in the US: Trends, Barriers and Prospects
A peer-reviewed study found that there are limited risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) between health care payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers in the United States, but interest in the agreements…