Resources
The National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC) is a health policy research organization dedicated to the advancement of good evidence and science, and to fostering an environment in the United States that supports medical innovation.
Filter by:
Topic
Topic
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Alternative Payment Models
- Biopharmaceutical Innovation
- Bundled Payments
- Clinical Pathways
- Decision Frameworks
- Elements of Value
- (-) Evidence for Decision Making
- Formulary/Benefit Design
- Formulary Development
- Good Practices for Evidence
- (-) Health Care Quality Measures
- Health Spending
- Health Spend Management
- High-Deductible Health Plans
- Impact on Outcome & Spending
- Individual Treatment Effects & Personalized Access
- IRA Implementation
- Low-Value Care
- (-) Pandemic Response
- Patient Cost Sharing
- Paying for Cures
- Policy & Regulatory Barriers
- (-) Real-World Data
- Real-World Evidence
- Regulatory Barriers & Challenges
- Understanding Health Spending
- Utilization Management & Step Therapy
- Value-Based Contracts
- Value-Based Insurance Design
- Value Assessment
- Value Assessment Frameworks
- (-) Value Assessment Methods
Resource Type
Resource Type
Audience
Audience
Display Only
Showing 91 Results
As Value Assessments Evolve, Are They Ready for Prime Time?
This peer-reviewed study examined the evolution of the value assessment landscape in the United States.
NPC Research Featured in Two Panels on Patient-Reported Measures in Oncology
A white paper by the National Pharmaceutical Council and Discern Health, Improving Patient-reported Measures in Oncology, was highlighted during two recent panels discussing recommendations for…
Loud and Clear: Key Takeaways from a Webinar on “Amplifying the Patient Voice” in Quality Measurement
In a Feb. 28 webinar from NPC and Discern Health, a group of diverse speakers discussed policy solutions for improving patient-reported measures in oncology value-based programs, along with a white…
Improving Patient-reported Measures in Oncology
This is a landscape analysis of available patient-reported measures and patient-reported performance measures in oncology and offers recommendations for filling gaps in measures and removing barriers…
FDA’s Real-World Data and Evidence Framework Is a Good Step Forward
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today released its framework for evaluating the potential use of real-world evidence (RWE) to help support the approval of a new indication for a pre-approved…
Real-World Data in the Current Health Care Environment
In this guest blog post, Dr. Eberechukwu Onukwugha of the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy's Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research explores the value of real-world data.
Restrictions, Variations in Specialty Drug Coverage May Affect Physician and Patient Choices
According to a study from the Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health at Tufts Medical Center and NPC, coverage of specialty medicines by major U.S. commercial health plans varies…
NPC at ISPOR 2018: Gathering and Curating Real-World Data
The use and importance of real-world evidence (RWE) in clinical decision-making has been frequently cited by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb, so it’s not surprising…
Peer-reviewed Journal Editors' Views on Real-world Evidence
A study published in the International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care reveals that real-world evidence is considered valuable by the editors of peer-reviewed journals—if it meets…
Where Are They Now: Checking In With Former NPC Intern Jan Hansen
Jan Hansen, PhD, currently Vice President, Evidence for Access Medical Unit, US Medical Affairs at Genentech, participated in NPC’s pharmaceutical internship program in 1982. Dr. Hansen chatted with…
What Kinds of Information Do Payers and Providers Want for Decision-Making?
A new white paper from Xcenda/AmerisourceBergen and NPC highlights survey findings from payers and providers on what types of evidence are most important to them when it comes to making population…
CER Collaborative Helps Health Care Decision-Makers Assess Evidence
A feature article in this month's Value and Outcomes Spotlight highlights the importance of comparative effectiveness research (CER) and details the CER Collaborative Initiative, a joint effort by…
NPC @ DIA 2017 Annual Meeting: Exploring Comparative Effectiveness Research
NPC Chief Science Officer and Executive Vice President Robert Dubois, MD, PhD, will address how comparative effectiveness research is being used by health care decision-makers at the Drug Information…
Why Value Framework Assessments Arrive at Different Conclusions: A Multiple Myeloma Case Study
Researchers conducted cross-framework comparisons of multiple myeloma assessments using four value assessment frameworks and examined the consistency of findings across three case studies.
Health Plan Use of Patient Data: From the Routine to the Transformational
As the abundance and variety of patient data elements and sources continue to grow, health plans seek opportunities to deepen insights from multiple sources of patient data to shape care delivery,…
How Are Health Plans Using Patient Data to Improve Outcomes?
Health plans collect enormous amounts of data through electronic health records, administrative claims, mobile health devices and other sources. Is the data simply sitting on a shelf, or is it being…
NPC Submits Comments to FDA on Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information
To achieve our shared goal of a high-performing, value-based health care system, informed and evidence-based decisions are needed. Greater efficiency and better care requires more information…
Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care
This comprehensive white paper from the National Pharmaceutical Council and Discern Health identified gaps in accountable care quality measure sets for cancer, which can lead to missed opportunities…
Improving Oncology Quality Measurement in Accountable Care: Filling Gaps with Cross-Cutting Measures
According to a study, gaps in the quality measures used by accountable care programs to assess cancer care may obscure problems in care delivery and lead to missed opportunities for improvement of…